Connect with us

Prince Harry’s Financial Woes: A Closer Look at the Money Scuffle

All round

Prince Harry’s Financial Woes: A Closer Look at the Money Scuffle

get top stories via email

In a shocking revelation, Prince Harry has claimed that his father, Prince Charles, has cut him off financially.

However, the true extent of Harry’s wealth tells a different story.

This week, the Royal House’s finances have come under scrutiny, thanks to Harry and Meghan’s recent actions.

Their explosive interview with Oprah Winfrey exposed alleged racism and cruelty within the palace walls, and now questions are being raised about how the family supports its members.

According to Globe Today, Prince Charles gave Harry and Meghan $2.5 million when they left in March 2020, with the intention that it would sustain them for a year.

Trending:

It is appalling that Harry continued to pressure his father for more money on top of this generous sum.

In the past, Harry was known for being frugal, but since meeting and marrying Meghan, his spending habits seem to have changed dramatically.

It is a known fact that narcissistic individuals tend to squander money, especially if it is not their own.

A palace source remarked that nobody forced Harry to purchase an £11 million property, highlighting the lack of gratitude and entitlement displayed by the couple.

They have no right to be on the global stage, as they have not earned that privilege.

Unlike ordinary families who struggle to make ends meet, Harry was born into immense privilege and knows nothing of their everyday struggles.

The notion of downsizing and living within their means seems foreign to them.

Meghan, in particular, seems unable to cope with the reality of a modest lifestyle, despite claiming to have been worth £5 million before marrying into the royal family.

The public may perceive millions as a significant amount, but it quickly diminishes if mismanaged or misunderstood.

Harry and Meghan’s laziness and lack of financial responsibility are evident.

Their combined worth, when considering their attempts to lecture the public, should not exceed £30,000 per year, which is the average income in the UK.

With this in mind, a modest home in a less desirable part of California would be more appropriate for them.

Their fall from grace cannot come soon enough, as their global interview insulted hardworking individuals striving to make a living.

During his interview with Oprah, Harry revealed that his family cut him off financially after he and Meghan stepped back from their roles as working members of the Royal House.

However, prior to their departure, Prince Charles had been supporting them with an annual sum of £4.49 million, according to the Duchy of Cornwall’s accounts.

Harry also mentioned that security was suddenly removed while they were in Canada, leaving them vulnerable.

Fortunately, he claimed that the money left to him by his mother, Princess Diana, saved the day.

Without it, they would not have been able to make their new life a reality.

This reasoning falls short when considering that Diana likely left an equal sum to Harry’s brother, William.

Did she anticipate that her money would be used to pay school fees and sustain William’s wife’s extravagant wardrobe?

The overall image painted by Harry is that he and Meghan were cast out, completely cut off from the royal family’s financial support.

They relied on Diana’s inheritance, their celebrity connections, and their ability to strike lucrative deals.

However, recent reports suggest that there may be another side to this financial dispute.

Did Charles cut off his son out of frustration or because he felt taken advantage of?

According to a well-placed source who spoke to The Telegraph, Charles grew tired of Harry constantly asking for more money.

He had already invested a significant amount in their wedding and the refurbishment of Frogmore Cottage, their Windsor home.

When they announced their decision to step back, they requested even more financial support.

It is understandable that Charles would be reluctant to continue being treated like a cash dispenser.

It is worth noting that when Harry and Meghan arrived in Los Angeles, they were not as financially helpless as they claimed to be.

They had access to millions of dollars in their bank accounts.

Princess Diana’s estate left behind a substantial sum, which had grown significantly over the years due to wise investments made by royal advisors.

Harry also received income from other undisclosed family trusts.

Meghan, too, entered royal life with a considerable amount of money, ranging from $2.6 to $35.4 million, thanks to her successful acting career.

Even without considering the Queen Mother’s potential bequest to Harry, the couple had a substantial fortune when they started their new life in the United States.

Their indignation at being cut off financially by Prince Charles becomes harder to sympathize with when considering their newfound wealth.

They signed a multi-million dollar deal with Netflix and another lucrative agreement with Spotify.

Suddenly, the £4.5 million allowance from Charles seems insignificant.

It is difficult to understand why a 36-year-old man would complain about his 70-something-year-old father no longer providing him with financial support, especially during a global economic crisis.

While security expenses did contribute to their financial concerns, it is puzzling that Harry and Meghan did not consider the burden they would place on UK taxpayers by expecting them to fund their security arrangements in Los Angeles.

Currently, only working members of the royal family receive police protection, and having a title does not automatically entitle a Windsor to armed officers.

Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie, for example, do not have taxpayer-funded bodyguards.

Despite their claims of financial hardship, the Sussexes managed to secure a lavish lifestyle for themselves in the US.

They purchased a $19 million mansion in Montecito before announcing their deals with Netflix and Spotify.

It is clear that they were not as financially vulnerable as they portrayed themselves to be.

In conclusion, Prince Harry’s assertion that he was cut off financially by Prince Charles raises questions about his true financial situation.

While security expenses did pose a challenge, the couple had substantial wealth at their disposal.

Their newfound success in striking multi-million dollar deals further diminishes any sympathy for their financial grievances.

The public’s perception of them has shifted, and their fall from grace appears imminent.

It is time for Harry and Meghan to take responsibility for their own financial affairs and live within their means, just like ordinary individuals striving to make a living.

Popular Posts:

get top stories via email

Continue Reading
Advertisement
You may also like...

New Stories

Top stories today

Popular this week

Popular Topics

Trending this month

To Top
yes