Connect with us

Meghan Markle’s Absence from King Charles’ Coronation Sparks Controversy

All round

Meghan Markle’s Absence from King Charles’ Coronation Sparks Controversy

get top stories via email

In a surprising turn of events, Meghan Markle will not be attending King Charles’ coronation in May, leading to speculation and debate about her relationship with the royal family.

While some view this as a compromise, others believe it to be a foolish choice that Meghan may come to regret in the future.

Unlike the jubilant scenes witnessed during Nelson Mandela’s release from unjust imprisonment, there were no dancing crowds in the streets when the palace made the official announcement.

However, citizens around the world collectively sighed in relief at the news of Meghan’s absence.

Palace aides reportedly celebrated the fact that the “Meghan circus” would not be an issue at the coronation.

Trending:

Meghan had a convenient excuse for missing Prince Philip’s funeral as she was pregnant.

However, doubts have been raised about the extent of her pregnancy and whether it truly prevented her from attending.

This time, Meghan hopes that her absence will be seen as a motherly gesture, perhaps to celebrate the birthday of their child, Archie Buck or is it Lily Buck?

On the other hand, Prince Harry was determined to attend Prince Philip’s funeral despite the challenges he faced from his family.

He and Meghan quickly accepted the invitation to the platinum Jubilee event, even without the coveted balcony package.

Speculation suggests that Harry might be trying to find a way back into the royal family without his wife, which puts the palace in a position of power.

This decision appears to highlight the growing estrangement between Meghan and both her husband’s family and her own, with the exception of her mother, Doria.

Meghan felt increasingly trapped in an impossible position, and there is a sense of relief that the situation has finally been resolved after much speculation and uncertainty.

Meghan’s absence from the coronation raises doubts about her future attendance at official or palace events.

It seems highly unlikely that we will see her participate unless it is at the King’s funeral.

King Charles, who has always expressed his love for his younger son, made a conciliatory statement during the Sandhurst passing out parade, emphasizing his pride in both Harry and William.

This gesture reflects the King’s desire to build bridges.

While Harry’s presence at the coronation may not completely mend the rift between the families, it can be seen as a temporary ceasefire.

If they can set aside their differences for Harry’s sake, it suggests that there may be a path to reconciliation in the future.

However, it is important to note that this is not a truce, and tensions still linger.

Harry’s decision to attend the coronation is seen by some as a concession, as he had previously hinted that discussions with his family were necessary before making a decision.

However, it appears that no such conversations have taken place.

Supporters of Charles argue that offering the Sussexes a role at the coronation would risk overshadowing the solemn celebration.

Critics, however, point out that if Charles truly wanted to spend more time with his grandchildren, he should not have evicted their parents from Frogmore Cottage on the Windsor Estate.

As the coronation approaches, all eyes will be on the royal family and how they navigate this delicate situation.

The absence of Meghan Markle raises questions about the future dynamics within the family and whether reconciliation is possible.

Only time will tell if this decision proves to be a wise one or if it further deepens the divide between Meghan and the royal family.

Popular Posts:

get top stories via email

Continue Reading
Advertisement
You may also like...

New Stories

Top stories today

Popular this week

Popular Topics

Trending this month

To Top
yes