All round
King Charles III’s Plan to Remove Non-Working Royals Threatens Harry’s State Councillor Role
In a surprising turn of events, King Charles III has made a bold statement that puts Prince Harry’s role as a state advisor in jeopardy.
Speculations of Harry being manipulated by others have been dismissed as King Charles III expresses his desire to amend the law regarding the possession of state councillor positions.
This move could potentially lead to a significant shift within the royal family.
Currently, Prince Harry, Prince Andrew, and Princess Beatrice hold key roles as councillors of state, despite not being working royals.
These three individuals, along with the spouse of the monarch and the four adults next in line to the throne, are relied upon to fulfill constitutional duties in case of illness or absence from the country.
Trending:
However, King Charles III intends to change the law so that only working members of the royal family can become councillors, which would strip Andrew, Harry, and Beatrice of their titles.
The incongruity of having non-working royals in positions that involve carrying out constitutional duties has been a topic of discussion for some time.
Buckingham Palace has faced calls to change the law, which can only be enacted by the Houses of Parliament, to relieve Andrew and Harry of their councillor roles.
It is reported that King Charles III is likely to take swift action to bring about the necessary changes.
If the law is amended, it is expected that Prince Edward and Princess Anne, who are prominent working royals, will be elevated to the position of councillors of the King.
Previously, Prince Andrew and Prince Harry served as councillors to Queen Elizabeth II, alongside Prince William and the former Prince of Wales.
However, with Charles ascending to the throne, new positions were created for Queen Camilla and Princess Beatrice.
The British public has expressed their support for King Charles III’s plan, viewing it as a demonstration of his wisdom.
People who once held grudges against Charles and his complicated love story with Camilla have gradually changed their opinion of him.
Many believe that his rise to the throne, coupled with his long-standing love and devotion to his mother, Queen Elizabeth, will bring about the necessary sternness towards Harry and his wife.
The removal of non-working royals from these state councillor positions and assigning them to individuals who are deserving of such roles is seen as a significant improvement.
Prince Andrew’s involvement with questionable characters has tarnished the reputation of the royal family, and the pain and suffering caused by Harry and Meghan Markle will not be easily forgotten.
The British people believe that these actions will help build loyalty to the new King.
While the support for King Charles III’s decision is strong, there is some regret regarding the impact on Princess Beatrice.
Many feel that she has shown remarkable growth since her marriage and should not be held accountable for her father’s actions.
Some argue that she and her husband would make excellent royal ambassadors and should be given the opportunity to represent the family.
However, if Princess Beatrice is retained as a councillor, it is essential for Charles and the palace to provide compelling reasons that would eliminate any potential rebellion from Andrew and Harry.
The composition of the councillors of state would likely consist of working royals such as Prince William, Princess Anne, Prince Edward, and potentially the Duke of Gloucester.
The future inclusion of individuals outside the line of succession, like Kate or Sophie, may also be considered.
King Charles III’s plan to eliminate non-working royals from state councillor positions has sparked discussions among the British public.
The decision is seen as a necessary step to streamline the monarchy and ensure that those in positions of influence and authority truly serve the best interests of the realm.
Time will tell how this plan unfolds and whether it brings about the desired changes.
Popular Posts:
- Queen’s damning reply to Prince Harry’s ‘what Meghan wants, Meghan gets’ outburst
- Here’s Why Meghan Markle Cannot File Harry Divorce In US
- Meghan Markle ‘escorted out of Prince Charles’ garden party’ in unearthed video
- Here’s Why Meghan Markle Cannot File Harry Divorce In US
- Prince Harry ‘kept asking for more money’ and Prince Charles got ‘fed up’
- Prince Charles ‘deliberately’ left Meghan out of Archie’s birthday message
- Prince Harry and Meghan ‘blamed staff when they didn’t get their way’
- Prince Harry has been ‘brainwashed’, says biographer
- Meghan Markle blogged about Kate’s wedding before claiming she ‘didn’t know much about royals’
- REVENGE: Beatrice’s pregnancy announcement total dig at Meghan Markle
- Damage is done: Prince Harry warned rift with Prince Charles is widening beyond repair
- Meghan Markle Oprah interview claims debunked by own blog post
- Prince Harry faces Backlash for podcast interview, Duke ‘making too much noise’
- Queen and Charles deeply upset with Harry’s rants
- Harry and Meghan are ‘trolling the world’ with hidden photos Archie, says their biographer
- Prince Harry Demands wife Meghan Markle Be Part Of Princess Diana’s 60th Birthday Tribute Or He Won’t Show
- Harry and Meghan are ‘trolling the world’ with hidden photos Archie, says their biographer
- Meghan Markle’s Plastic Surgery
- Meghan and Harry CAN’T do another bombshell interview – ‘Can only do one’
- How Kate Middleton earned the Queen’s respect
- William and Kate prove they are NOT ‘trapped’ despite Harry claims
- Kate Middleton ‘won’t be walked over by Meghan Markle,’ says Jenny Eclair
- Meghan ‘wasn’t too keen’ on living in smaller place than Kate and William after royal wedding
- Meghan Markle was a ‘failure’ in Hollywood, biographer reveals
- Meghan and Harry are trying to start ‘alternate woke Royal Family,’ Expert says
