Connect with us

Prince Harry Faces Backlash Over Security Costs as Royal Commentator Calls on Netflix to Foot the Bill

All round

Prince Harry Faces Backlash Over Security Costs as Royal Commentator Calls on Netflix to Foot the Bill

get top stories via email

Prince Harry has recently taken legal action against the UK government, claiming that it is unsafe for his family to return without their police bodyguards.

However, this move has sparked criticism from royal commentator Sarah Vine, who penned an article titled “Prince Harry, if you still want security for the family, make sure your mates at Netflix pay for it.”

Vine wasted no time in expressing her disdain for Harry’s actions, describing him as a “whining, pathetic bore” and an “entitled, tedious little ingrate.”

She accused him of trashing his own family, publicizing his grievances worldwide, and even taking a swipe at his 95-year-old grandmother when she was already down.

The commentator emphasized that it was Harry and Meghan’s own choice to leave behind their royal lifestyle and seek a different life in America.

Trending:

They believed that their ambitions surpassed the limitations imposed by their previous roles within the British monarchy.

However, Vine argued that they had ample opportunities to succeed in their royal duties but simply lacked the motivation to try.

Rather than taking responsibility for their decisions, the couple has spent the past two years blaming others for their problems.

Vine criticized their hypocrisy and arrogance, highlighting their use of private jets while advocating for climate change action, and their enjoyment of taxpayer-funded privileges while showing resentment towards their obligations.

The commentator also pointed out that Harry and Meghan often portrayed themselves as victims, refusing to acknowledge their own role in the ongoing drama.

Their taxpayer-funded security protection was revoked when they chose to relinquish their royal status and relocate to California.

Vine questioned why the British people should continue to pay for individuals who have distanced themselves from the country and its royal family.

Drawing a parallel, Vine suggested that if someone were to quit their job, badmouth their former employer, and demand to keep company benefits, it would be deemed unreasonable.

She called on Harry to ensure that his new connections at Netflix cover the costs of his security, insinuating that they would gladly do so in exchange for another opportunity to criticize Britain.

The timing of Harry’s legal action was also criticized by Vine, who deemed it aggressive and insensitive considering the current difficulties faced by the Queen.

She concluded her article by asserting that Harry had become the type of person who would sue his own grandmother, a sentiment that reflected her disapproval of his actions.

The backlash against Prince Harry’s demand for continued security funding from the British taxpayer highlights the ongoing debate surrounding his departure from royal duties.

As public opinion remains divided, it is clear that his decision to take legal action has only intensified the scrutiny he faces.

Popular Posts:

get top stories via email

Continue Reading
Advertisement
You may also like...

New Stories

To Top
yes