All round
Tom Cruise banned Katie Holmes from dating for five years after their divorce
get top stories via email
Rumors of a romance between Katie Holmes and Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx have been circulating for years, and US gossip site Radar Online believes it understands why they haven’t confirmed it yet.
According to a recent report, the 37-year-old’s divorce agreement specifies that she cannot openly date anybody for five years after her divorce from Tom Cruise.
“Katie signed a clause in her quickie divorce settlement that prevents her from embarrassing Tom in various ways, like talking about him or Scientology, or publicly dating another man for five years after the divorce,” the insider told the outlet.
“She’s allowed to date, but she cannot do so in a public fashion, and she’s not supposed to let any boyfriend near their daughter, Suri,” they continued.
Trending:
According to the source, Katie promised to keep her romantic life quiet in order for the divorce to be completed promptly.
“Katie wanted out of the marriage so badly, she agreed to the terms — and got $4.8 million in child support, plus another $5 million for herself.”
So, if Katie announces a new relationship before the end of 2017, she stands to lose around $10 million. We’ll have to wait until next year for a major announcement.
After five years of marriage, the actress, who shares 10-year-old Suri with Tom, startled the world when she filed for divorce from the 54-year-old in June 2012.
In terms of her love life, the mother-of-one has never spoken about it, and she recently snubbed queries about it with a firm “That’s not something I want to answer!”
Instead, she says she hopes to remarry one day.
“I’m a very loving person,” she told People magazine, “Of course I’m open to finding love again.”
Katie and Jamie were first seen dancing together at a charity in The Hamptons in August 2013, and rumours appeared two months later saying they were more than pals.
This year, Holmes was seen cheering Foxx on during a performance by Barbra Streisand in New York before joining him in the dressing area.
Popular Posts:
- Queen’s damning reply to Prince Harry’s ‘what Meghan wants, Meghan gets’ outburst
- Here’s Why Meghan Markle Cannot File Harry Divorce In US
- Meghan Markle ‘escorted out of Prince Charles’ garden party’ in unearthed video
- Here’s Why Meghan Markle Cannot File Harry Divorce In US
- Prince Harry ‘kept asking for more money’ and Prince Charles got ‘fed up’
- Prince Charles ‘deliberately’ left Meghan out of Archie’s birthday message
- Prince Harry and Meghan ‘blamed staff when they didn’t get their way’
- Prince Harry has been ‘brainwashed’, says biographer
- Meghan Markle blogged about Kate’s wedding before claiming she ‘didn’t know much about royals’
- REVENGE: Beatrice’s pregnancy announcement total dig at Meghan Markle
- Damage is done: Prince Harry warned rift with Prince Charles is widening beyond repair
- Meghan Markle Oprah interview claims debunked by own blog post
- Prince Harry faces Backlash for podcast interview, Duke ‘making too much noise’
- Queen and Charles deeply upset with Harry’s rants
- Harry and Meghan are ‘trolling the world’ with hidden photos Archie, says their biographer
- Prince Harry Demands wife Meghan Markle Be Part Of Princess Diana’s 60th Birthday Tribute Or He Won’t Show
- Harry and Meghan are ‘trolling the world’ with hidden photos Archie, says their biographer
- Meghan Markle’s Plastic Surgery
- Meghan and Harry CAN’T do another bombshell interview – ‘Can only do one’
- How Kate Middleton earned the Queen’s respect
- William and Kate prove they are NOT ‘trapped’ despite Harry claims
- Meghan ‘wasn’t too keen’ on living in smaller place than Kate and William after royal wedding
- Kate Middleton ‘won’t be walked over by Meghan Markle,’ says Jenny Eclair
- Meghan Markle was a ‘failure’ in Hollywood, biographer reveals
- Meghan and Harry are trying to start ‘alternate woke Royal Family,’ Expert says