Connect with us

Meghan Markle’s Deceptive Humanitarian Persona: A Closer Look at Her True Motives

All round

Meghan Markle’s Deceptive Humanitarian Persona: A Closer Look at Her True Motives

Updated on
See more articles on:

get top stories via email

In recent news, the spotlight is once again on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, the infamous couple known for their hypocritical actions.

Meghan, who previously championed humanitarian causes and claimed to have a burning desire to save the world, is now under scrutiny for her dehumanizing statement.

It seems that her supposed passion for helping others has taken a backseat since her union with Prince Harry.

So, what happened to their commitment to making a difference in the lives of the less fortunate?

Before her marriage to Prince Harry, Meghan was actively involved in various humanitarian endeavors.

Trending:

    She frequently spoke about her love for empowering women and girls, striving for equality, and providing access to clean water.

    Her dedication to these causes was evident in her lifestyle blog, The Tig, and numerous interviews during her time on the television show Suits.

    It was clear that Meghan wanted to establish herself as a feminist and a humanitarian, even before meeting Prince Harry.

    Prince Harry, too, had his share of philanthropic interests, particularly in Africa, where he had a deep connection and a passion for saving elephants and other endangered species.

    So why have they suddenly retreated to the confines of Montecito, seemingly abandoning their commitment to making a difference?

    After all, airlines still fly to these countries, people still need water, and girls still need education.

    The need for change is as pressing as ever, so why the sudden pause?

    Speculations suggest that their humanitarian endeavors may have been nothing more than a ploy to win over Prince Harry.

    Meghan’s involvement in a USO tour in 2014, for example, could have been a calculated move to gain publicity and enhance her image.

    It wasn’t until she started dating Prince Harry in 2016 that she resumed her humanitarian work.

    This two-year gap in her wiki page raises questions about the authenticity of her commitment.

    Reports indicate that Meghan’s visits to India and Africa were brief and primarily focused on photo opportunities.

    It appears that she hired a PR team to secure these gigs rather than engaging in genuine acts of charity.

    With Prince Harry by her side, Meghan no longer feels the need to invest her own money in these endeavors.

    Moreover, it is worth noting that no one is currently paying her for her supposed humanitarian work.

    Prince Harry, on the other hand, has expressed his frustration with the British royal family, claiming that they compelled him to engage in charitable activities.

    However, without any incentives, he seems content with wasting time and complaining.

    It is becoming increasingly evident that neither Harry nor Meghan genuinely care about these causes.

    They seem to believe that by merely proclaiming themselves as caring individuals, they will receive adoration and praise.

    Meghan’s attempt to cultivate a humanitarian persona was likely motivated by her desire to expand her brand and secure financial opportunities.

    As her acting career reached a plateau, she needed a new avenue to maintain her relevance.

    Multiple interviews reveal that Meghan struggled to provide concrete examples of her hands-on involvement in these causes.

    Her lack of substance raises doubts about her sincerity and exposes her as a fraud.

    Ironically, Meghan could have made a positive impact on the world without actually doing much.

    By interviewing and highlighting individuals who are making a difference, she could have raised awareness and inspired others to get involved.

    Yet, her refusal to acknowledge anyone besides herself prevents her from embracing this approach.

    Meghan’s ambition to become the next Amal Clooney or Angelina Jolie blinds her to the fact that true humanitarian work requires years of dedication and genuine action.

    In contrast, Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, has taken a different path.

    Over the course of ten years, she has explored her passions, listened to experts, and identified areas where she can make a meaningful difference.

    Catherine now has a separate center, academic and business partnerships, and the Shaping Us campaign to showcase her commitment to various causes.

    Unlike Meghan and Harry, she has tangible achievements to her name.

    Raising a family in the public eye is challenging enough, but Catherine manages to balance her royal duties while ensuring her children grow up with values of decency, gratitude, and care for others.

    In contrast, Meghan and Harry seem more focused on their own desires and aspirations, rather than using their platform to effect real change.

    The title of a hypocritical humanitarian seems fitting for Meghan Markle, considering the stark contrast between her words and actions.

    However, it is essential to remember that true humanitarianism requires genuine dedication and selflessness.

    Meghan’s ambitions may have gotten the better of her, leading her down a path of deception and self-promotion.

    What are your thoughts on Meghan’s aspirations?

    Do you believe she is truly committed to making a difference, or is it all just a facade?

    Share your opinions in the comments below.

    We value your input.

    Stay tuned for more updates and engaging content.

    Thank you for joining us today.

    Popular Posts:

    get top stories via email

    MORE ARTICLES ABOUT:
    Continue Reading
    Advertisement
    You may also like...

    New Stories

    To Top
    yes

    get top stories via email

    No, thank you.