All round
Harry’s Former Friends Refuse to Testify in Court
Prince Harry’s legal battle against Mirror Group Newspapers, publisher of the Daily Mail and Sunday Mirror, has taken a new turn as none of his former friends came forward to testify in support of his version of events.
The judge presiding over the case, Mr Justice Fancourt, expressed his disappointment that none of the 20 people mentioned by Harry in his statement, including Chelsea Davie, Guy Pelly, Tom Inskip, Jamie Murray-Wells, and Natalie Pinkham, were willing to testify.
According to Harry, these individuals were aware that he was being spied on by the media.
However, when the time came for them to support him in court, they chose to remain silent.
This has raised questions about why none of Harry’s friends wanted to testify, especially after he proved to have no concrete proof of what he said other than his belief that it was the truth.
Trending:
Tom Inskip, also known as Skippy, has been friends with Harry since childhood.
However, he denied any relationship with Harry and repeatedly ignored events involving the royal couple.
An insider revealed that Tom never wanted to face a traitor again.
Similarly, Chelsea Davie, Guy Pelly, Jamie Murray-Wells, and Natalie Pinkham were all absent from court.
During Tuesday’s hearing, Mr Justice Fancourt listed the names of more than two dozen people who could have been brought before him to testify.
He questioned whether any of the individuals on his list should have given evidence.
The former Daily Mirror editor, Morgan, and former People editor, Neil Wallace, were among those mentioned by the judge.
He also raised concerns about why three out of four associates of the Duke of Sussex had not given evidence in the case.
Harry’s ex-friends are believed to have put honour and respect for the monarchy before him.
They come from old established families, with connections that go back hundreds of years.
They are not willing to risk their reputation by taking sides with a perceived traitor to the royal family.
They probably know too much about his wayward lifestyle and prefer to keep out of what’s happening with Harry and Meghan nowadays.
It is unclear what Harry expected his former friends to testify about since he claimed to have no evidence.
He had been calling them for help since he started writing, but their response through the press was not supportive.
They warned him not to say anything about them that would cause them trouble, or they would talk about things that Charles didn’t know about him.
This made it clear that they were serious about not wanting to get involved in his legal battle.
The lawyers had to go to great lengths to keep Harry’s former friends out of court, so the Mirror Group or ANL would not bring them up as witnesses against him.
Harry’s ex-friends consider him a traitor, and they are as angry with him as William is.
They are not going to testify about something that happened 25 years ago and risk their reputation and connections to the monarchy.
In conclusion, Harry’s legal battle against Mirror Group Newspapers has taken a new turn as his former friends refuse to testify in court.
The judge expressed his disappointment that none of the individuals mentioned by Harry in his statement were willing to come forward and support him.
It is believed that Harry’s ex-friends put honour and respect for the monarchy before him and are not willing to risk their reputation by taking sides with a perceived traitor to the royal family.
Popular Posts:
- Queen’s damning reply to Prince Harry’s ‘what Meghan wants, Meghan gets’ outburst
- Here’s Why Meghan Markle Cannot File Harry Divorce In US
- Meghan Markle ‘escorted out of Prince Charles’ garden party’ in unearthed video
- Here’s Why Meghan Markle Cannot File Harry Divorce In US
- Prince Harry ‘kept asking for more money’ and Prince Charles got ‘fed up’
- Prince Charles ‘deliberately’ left Meghan out of Archie’s birthday message
- Prince Harry and Meghan ‘blamed staff when they didn’t get their way’
- Prince Harry has been ‘brainwashed’, says biographer
- Meghan Markle blogged about Kate’s wedding before claiming she ‘didn’t know much about royals’
- REVENGE: Beatrice’s pregnancy announcement total dig at Meghan Markle
- Damage is done: Prince Harry warned rift with Prince Charles is widening beyond repair
- Meghan Markle Oprah interview claims debunked by own blog post
- Prince Harry faces Backlash for podcast interview, Duke ‘making too much noise’
- Queen and Charles deeply upset with Harry’s rants
- Harry and Meghan are ‘trolling the world’ with hidden photos Archie, says their biographer
- Prince Harry Demands wife Meghan Markle Be Part Of Princess Diana’s 60th Birthday Tribute Or He Won’t Show
- Harry and Meghan are ‘trolling the world’ with hidden photos Archie, says their biographer
- Meghan Markle’s Plastic Surgery
- Meghan and Harry CAN’T do another bombshell interview – ‘Can only do one’
- How Kate Middleton earned the Queen’s respect
- William and Kate prove they are NOT ‘trapped’ despite Harry claims
- Meghan ‘wasn’t too keen’ on living in smaller place than Kate and William after royal wedding
- Kate Middleton ‘won’t be walked over by Meghan Markle,’ says Jenny Eclair
- Meghan Markle was a ‘failure’ in Hollywood, biographer reveals
- Meghan and Harry are trying to start ‘alternate woke Royal Family,’ Expert says
