All round
Disgraced Harry and Meghan: Australian Claims to be Non-Marital Son of King Charles III
In the midst of the frenzy surrounding the revelations of Harry and Meghan, another individual has emerged to remind the world of his existence.
Simon Charles Durante Day, an Australian who refers to himself as the non-marital son of King Charles III, has been asserting for years that he is the product of a secret love affair between the current king and queen.
According to Durante Day, Camille became pregnant in 1965, after which she vanished from the public eye for nine months.
Meanwhile, the young Charles, who was still a prince at the time, was sent away to study in Australia.
In April 1966, Simon was born and subsequently put up for adoption by an alleged employee of the royal household, who happened to be his adoptive grandmother.
Trending:
Durante Day frequently makes headlines, consistently adding new details to his extraordinary tale.
In a recent interview, he claimed to have undergone surgery at the age of eight to change the color of his iris from blue to brown, in order to conceal his resemblance to members of the royal family.
However, two women, who identify themselves as Simon’s sisters, have publicly refuted their brother’s claims, dismissing him as the false prince of Australia.
Tracy, aged 52, believes she may be Durante Day’s biological sister, while Amanda, aged 56, is his older adoptive sister.
Together, they maintain a Facebook page dedicated to exposing the lies and inconsistencies in his stories.
The women assert that their adoptive grandmother never worked for the royal family, nor did her husband.
Furthermore, there is no evidence supporting Durante Day’s statement that he had no official documents until the time of his adoption.
In fact, his birth certificate and baptismal record reveal the name of his birth mother to be Sandra Pinder.
According to Tracy and Amanda, Durante Day profits from his sensationalized media appearances, and they suspect that his motivation lies in seeking recognition or perhaps rewriting the narrative of his birth into a tale of forbidden love.
The question remains: do you believe the Australian’s story?
Popular Posts:
- Queen’s damning reply to Prince Harry’s ‘what Meghan wants, Meghan gets’ outburst
- Here’s Why Meghan Markle Cannot File Harry Divorce In US
- Meghan Markle ‘escorted out of Prince Charles’ garden party’ in unearthed video
- Here’s Why Meghan Markle Cannot File Harry Divorce In US
- Prince Harry ‘kept asking for more money’ and Prince Charles got ‘fed up’
- Prince Charles ‘deliberately’ left Meghan out of Archie’s birthday message
- Prince Harry and Meghan ‘blamed staff when they didn’t get their way’
- Prince Harry has been ‘brainwashed’, says biographer
- Meghan Markle blogged about Kate’s wedding before claiming she ‘didn’t know much about royals’
- REVENGE: Beatrice’s pregnancy announcement total dig at Meghan Markle
- Damage is done: Prince Harry warned rift with Prince Charles is widening beyond repair
- Meghan Markle Oprah interview claims debunked by own blog post
- Prince Harry faces Backlash for podcast interview, Duke ‘making too much noise’
- Queen and Charles deeply upset with Harry’s rants
- Harry and Meghan are ‘trolling the world’ with hidden photos Archie, says their biographer
- Prince Harry Demands wife Meghan Markle Be Part Of Princess Diana’s 60th Birthday Tribute Or He Won’t Show
- Harry and Meghan are ‘trolling the world’ with hidden photos Archie, says their biographer
- Meghan Markle’s Plastic Surgery
- Meghan and Harry CAN’T do another bombshell interview – ‘Can only do one’
- How Kate Middleton earned the Queen’s respect
- William and Kate prove they are NOT ‘trapped’ despite Harry claims
- Kate Middleton ‘won’t be walked over by Meghan Markle,’ says Jenny Eclair
- Meghan ‘wasn’t too keen’ on living in smaller place than Kate and William after royal wedding
- Meghan Markle was a ‘failure’ in Hollywood, biographer reveals
- Meghan and Harry are trying to start ‘alternate woke Royal Family,’ Expert says
