The Royal Family’s decision to strip Prince Harry and Meghan Markle of their Duke and Duchess of Sussex titles has caused a stir.

The UK government, in collaboration with King Charles, is now taking steps to address this matter following the couple’s controversial statements about the royal family.

The revocation of their titles was discussed at the highest level, hinting at plans to make the Dukedom of Sussex a lifetime title instead of a hereditary one.

Speculations suggest that the reason behind this move is to keep the title in reserve for someone special in the future, rather than passing it down to subsequent generations.

If this were the case, the title would revert back to the crown upon Harry’s death, meaning that their son, Archie, would never become the Duke of Sussex.

It is anticipated that King Charles will either take away the Sussex title after his coronation or introduce new rules to prevent Meghan from benefiting from it any longer.

As the monarch, he must prioritize the people’s interests, which presents a challenging lesson for him.

This is the first time Charles will face such a predicament, as he has not been in a position of power before.

The government is also making efforts to have the title removed entirely, although I support a move that prevents Archie from inheriting it.

Nonetheless, I believe the title should be revoked from its current holder.

Harry’s attendance at the coronation is expected to be fraught with tension, considering the content of his book and the Netflix docuseries, where he made disparaging remarks about his family.

The Windsors are known for holding grudges and being unforgiving, so it is unlikely to be a smooth encounter.

Moreover, Harry attending the event alone may not sit well with the British public.

Looking ahead, it is unfortunate that Archie and his sister, Lily, will miss the opportunity to be in London on their grandfather’s coronation day, alongside their extended family.

It would have been a remarkable story for Archie to tell in the future if he had attended his grandpa’s coronation on his fourth birthday.

Despite these discussions, Paul Burrell, a former royal butler to the late Queen and Princess Diana, believes that King Charles will not strip Harry and Meghan of their titles.

Burrell asserts that the king is cautious and doesn’t want to ignite further conflicts.

He has handled the situation with care, extending invitations to the couple and maintaining the moral high ground.

Burrell suggests that other individuals may desire the titles to be taken away, but the king will make his own decision.

Charles has always been resolute and focused, following his own path.

He could have changed the rules, like the late queen, to prevent Meghan and Harry’s children from becoming princes and princesses, but he chose not to.

This decision was likely made to avoid further controversy and maintain a peaceful environment surrounding the coronation.

It is evident that King Charles faces a delicate balancing act, considering both public opinion and his personal feelings as Harry’s father.

He now experiences firsthand the dilemma that the queen encountered throughout her life – the challenge of navigating between family and the expectations of the people.

The king aims for a smooth and trouble-free coronation, just like the queen did.

In conclusion, the UK government, in collaboration with King Charles, is addressing the issue of Harry and Meghan’s revoked titles.

While there were discussions about removing the titles, it is unlikely that the king will take this step.

Instead, he is focused on maintaining harmony and ensuring a smooth transition during his coronation.

This situation poses a unique challenge for the king, as he must balance the expectations of the people with his personal relationship with his son.