In a recent development, a significant witness, Gavin Gringas, has come forward to claim that there is no baby Archie, as widely believed.

According to Gringas, the child in question is actually the offspring of Meghan Markle’s friend, Bryn Gringas.

It appears that the biological mother, who served as a surrogate for Meghan, decided against giving up her baby to Meghan and Harry, resulting in baby Archie remaining in her care.

This revelation challenges the notion that Meghan was ever pregnant with Archie or any other child.

Reports suggest that Meghan may be infertile due to multiple abortions.

Consequently, the existence of a royal baby named Archie is now being questioned.

Remarkably, it is alleged that Meghan employed a prosthetic belly, similar to those used by actresses in movies, to create the illusion of pregnancy.

Furthermore, it is claimed that she is once again utilizing a surrogate for this supposed baby.

However, attempts to deceive some people some of the time have been unsuccessful, as Meghan’s ruse has been exposed.

Adding further weight to these claims, Rachel Markle, Meghan’s sister, disclosed in her book that she became infertile after undergoing several abortions during her previous marriage.

These revelations raise questions about Meghan’s own fertility and the potential motivations behind her actions.

Additionally, it has been suggested that Meghan’s upbringing was tumultuous, with her father raising her due to her mother, Doria, serving time in prison for embezzlement and fraud.

Such information, when combined with other evidence, contributes to the growing skepticism surrounding Meghan’s narrative.

Another witness, Michael DeVaird, expressed his initial confusion upon viewing photos of Meghan and Archie published on page 6 of a prominent publication.

Some speculated that Meghan strategically timed the release of these pictures to overshadow Prince Louis’s third birthday.

Nevertheless, DeVaird acknowledges the undeniable impact of these photos, which provide a rare glimpse of Archie’s face and mark the first instance of Meghan publicly venturing out with him.

These images have left many questioning the validity of claims suggesting that Archie does not exist or is being purposefully hidden.

While some remain skeptical, it is worth noting that the Queen and other members of the royal family have confirmed Archie’s existence.

However, their reticence to elaborate further raises suspicions.

Are these recently published photos of Archie the ultimate proof that he does indeed live with Meghan and Harry?

Or do they serve another purpose entirely?

These questions continue to perplex observers.

In an attempt to shed light on the matter, a CNN reporter, who happens to be friends with Meghan, allegedly used their own child in a video clip shown during the interview with Oprah Winfrey.

This revelation adds another layer of complexity to the situation.

Further investigation has uncovered a photograph of Bryn Gringas with her family, prominently featuring her son Gavin, who bears a striking resemblance to Archie.

It is regrettable that an innocent child’s name is now intertwined with these allegations.

If any fraudulent activities are indeed taking place, it is crucial to remember that the child involved is blameless, while the responsibility lies with the parents.

The motivations behind such actions remain unclear, but one undeniable consequence is the substantial financial gain resulting from the Oprah Winfrey interview.

The controversy surrounding Archie’s existence has generated significant attention and speculation.

As the public continues to judge for themselves, the mystery surrounding baby Archie deepens, leaving us all eager for further revelations.