The recent Trooping of Colour event showcased not only the royal family but also the growing discontent surrounding them.

As the day unfolded, many were left talking about Kate Middleton’s appearance, the noticeable scar above her eye, and the palpable tension between her and Prince William.

Behind the scenes at Kensington Palace, speculation runs rampant, suggesting that all is not well within the royal household.

King Charles and other family members faced boos from the crowd, which many interpreted as a clear sign of the monarchy’s declining popularity.

Observers noted the awkward interactions between William and Kate, leading to questions about their relationship and the family’s overall dynamics.

This awkwardness, combined with the public’s reaction, paints a picture of a royal family grappling with its image and relevance in modern society.

Interestingly, the UK media seems reluctant to delve into these issues.

Instead of addressing the evident problems within the royal family, they have turned their attention to Meghan Markle, blaming her for the family’s misfortunes.

This narrative shift raises eyebrows, as it seems to deflect attention from the royal family’s own shortcomings and unpopularity.

Once a central figure in royal discussions, Meghan has now become a scapegoat for the media’s frustrations with the monarchy.

The British press has fixated on trivial matters, such as a post from Nacho Figueras featuring raspberry jam and dog biscuits, rather than focusing on the significant events unfolding within the royal family.

It’s perplexing how such a mundane topic could overshadow a woman who has been largely absent from the public eye for six months.

Piers Morgan, a prominent commentator, recently engaged in a heated discussion regarding the royal family’s transparency about health issues.

He argued that if King Charles and Kate truly wanted to connect with the public, they should be more open about their health struggles.

Ironically, this same media has historically called for Meghan to share every detail of her life when she was still part of the royal fold.

The double standards are glaring.

While Morgan raised valid points about the need for transparency, he also fell into the trap of blaming Meghan for Figueras’s harmless post.

Tessa Dunlop, another commentator, challenged Morgan’s perspective, highlighting how the media’s obsession with Meghan detracts from the pressing issues facing the royal family.

It’s a curious phenomenon when a couple living far away from royal duties can still dominate headlines.

Dunlop’s critique of Morgan’s fixation on the Sussexes reveals a deeper issue—an obsession that seems to consume much of the British media.

Despite claiming indifference, Morgan’s constant references to Harry and Meghan suggest otherwise.

This obsession seems to stem from a refusal to let go of a narrative that no longer holds the same weight.

The conversation around Figueras’s post underscores the absurdity of the media’s priorities.

How can a jar of jam and some dog biscuits take precedence over the royal family’s apparent struggles?

It highlights a troubling trend where sensationalism overshadows genuine newsworthy events.

In a way, Figueras inadvertently drew attention to the royal family’s plight, showcasing how detached they have become from public interest.

Moreover, the royal family’s attempts to maintain a polished image seem increasingly futile.

With every attempt to divert attention, they only highlight their irrelevance in today’s society.

The more they try to control the narrative, the more the public sees through the façade.

This disconnect is evident, as many people now view the monarchy with skepticism rather than reverence.

In this climate, it’s clear that the monarchy faces an uphill battle to regain its footing.

The royal family must confront the reality of their situation rather than hide behind distractions.

As they continue to grapple with their image, the public’s patience may wear thin, and their relevance could dwindle further.

The media’s fixation on Meghan and the trivialities surrounding her illustrates a larger issue within the British press.

By focusing on sensational stories instead of addressing the royal family’s challenges, they risk alienating their audience.

People want authenticity and transparency, especially from institutions that have historically relied on public support.

As the royal family navigates these turbulent waters, they must recognize that the world has changed.

The days of unquestioned loyalty to the crown are fading, and with them, the monarchy’s influence.

The time for introspection and genuine connection with the public is now, or they may find themselves increasingly sidelined in the national conversation.