In a surprising turn of events, Prince Harry has stirred controversy by choosing not to sing the UK’s national anthem during a recent charity event in Nigeria.

This incident occurred as he and Meghan Markle wrapped up their three-day visit to the West African nation on Sunday.

The couple was present when “God Save the King” played, yet they stood silently, exchanging smirks while facing forward, drawing attention for their lack of participation.

This moment was particularly striking because the anthem pays tribute to Harry’s father, King Charles III.

Paul Burrell, who was once Princess Diana’s butler, weighed in on the situation during a segment on GB News with host Patrick Christie’s.

Burrell highlighted the couple’s noticeable silence during the anthem, calling it an embarrassing spectacle not just for them but for the entire nation.

His remarks resonated with many, as he questioned why the couple continues to position themselves as royal figures on the global stage despite stepping back from their official roles.

Burrell went further, suggesting that King Charles should address this behavior with his son.

He argued that it reflects poorly on the monarchy, especially in a Commonwealth country where royal representation is paramount.

Additionally, he raised concerns about the appropriateness of playing the national anthem at an event that wasn’t an official royal visit, questioning the Foreign Office’s role in managing the Sussexes’ public appearances.

The former butler expressed confusion over why the anthem was played at all, given that Harry and Meghan no longer represent the monarchy.

He pointed out that if it were a genuine royal engagement, the anthem would typically be expected.

Burrell speculated whether Meghan even knew the words to the anthem, while asserting that Harry likely did but chose not to sing.

This led him to conclude that the entire situation was somewhat chaotic.

Adding to the discourse, royal expert Tina Brown labeled the Sussexes’ antics a “clown show,” suggesting they’ve left the monarchy in a precarious state.

Speaking on Times Radio, she emphasized that the future of the monarchy hangs by a thread, and that thread is Catherine, Princess of Wales.

Brown believes Catherine is the key figure in the next generation, especially following the Sussexes’ departure from royal duties.

Rumors are swirling that King Charles is contemplating measures to prevent Harry and Meghan from making future visits to Commonwealth countries.

Royal expert Tom Quinn noted that the King is in a challenging position.

While he would like to strip the couple of their royal titles, he fears such actions would come off as vindictive.

Instead, his primary focus is to halt any unauthorized trips by the Sussexes.

Quinn elaborated on the King’s dilemma, stating that he must find a way to stop further invitations to Harry and Meghan.

The concern is that Meghan’s rebellious nature could inadvertently make her more appealing than the more traditional members of the royal family, such as William and Kate.

He pointed out that Meghan’s public displays of affection, like holding Harry’s hand for the cameras, contrast sharply with the more reserved demeanor of the Waleses.

As the fallout from this incident continues, many are left wondering what the future holds for the Sussexes and their relationship with the royal family.

The combination of Harry and Meghan’s actions and the subsequent public reaction raises questions about their role and relevance within the monarchy.

With the monarchy facing unprecedented challenges, the spotlight now shines brightly on King Charles and his decisions regarding his son and daughter-in-law.

The ongoing saga of the Sussexes seems far from over, with each new development adding another layer to their complex relationship with the British royal family.