The situation surrounding Prince Harry, Duchess Meghan, and their children during their time in the UK has taken a troubling turn.

Reports reveal that the threats they faced were not only serious but also well-documented.

From disturbing incidents like Meghan receiving a package containing white powder to the racial abuse directed at her and their children by both the media and the public, the couple’s plight has been largely ignored by the royal family.

Despite the alarming circumstances, the royal family’s response was shockingly inadequate.

When Harry and Meghan decided to step back from their roles as working royals, they were stripped of their security detail.

This left them vulnerable at a time when Meghan had openly expressed her fears for their safety.

In a heartfelt plea, she wrote letters to the royal family, emphasizing that while she understood her own protection might not be a priority, she implored them to ensure Harry’s safety amidst the rising tide of threats.

Former Metropolitan Police Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu has spoken out about the severe threats faced by the Sussexes.

He characterized these threats as “disgusting and very real,” highlighting the rise of extreme right-wing terrorism in the UK.

Basu noted that credible threats against Meghan were indeed a concern, with investigations leading to prosecutions.

His statements underscore the gravity of the situation, suggesting that if the public were aware of the threats, they too would feel a constant sense of danger.

During the Sandringham summit in January 2020, Prince Harry even offered to personally fund his family’s security while in the UK.

However, this request was denied, despite the clear and ongoing threats against them.

Harry later took legal action against the Home Office regarding the decision to downgrade his security, but the court ultimately ruled against him, denying his appeal to restore those protections.

The royal family’s role in this saga raises questions about their priorities.

If they genuinely wanted to protect Harry and Meghan, one would assume that adequate security measures would have been put in place.

Yet, the stark contrast between the treatment of the Sussexes and other public figures is hard to ignore.

Recently, Nigel Farage was offered enhanced security by the Home Office after being targeted with milkshakes during a campaign event, a move that has sparked outrage given the Sussexes’ more serious threats.

Critics have pointed out the apparent hypocrisy in prioritizing Farage’s safety over that of Prince Harry and his family.

After all, the Sussexes have faced repeated threats, some resulting in criminal convictions, while Farage’s incident was relatively minor.

This discrepancy has led many to believe that the royal family may have influenced the decision to deny Harry and Meghan security, reflecting deeper biases within the institution.

Public reaction to the Home Office’s decision has been overwhelmingly negative.

Many have taken to social media to express their disbelief that a former working royal could be denied protection while a controversial political figure receives it without question.

Comments have highlighted the underlying racial dynamics, suggesting that Harry’s marriage to a biracial woman plays a significant role in the royal family’s reluctance to support him.

The backlash continues to grow, with many questioning the motivations behind these decisions.

Some argue that the royal family and the Home Office are prioritizing political affiliations and personal vendettas over the safety of a member of the monarchy.

The contrast in treatment between Harry and Farage serves as a glaring example of systemic issues within British institutions.

As the public discourse evolves, it remains evident that the treatment of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle raises critical questions about race, privilege, and the responsibilities of the royal family.

The disparity in security provisions speaks volumes about the current state of affairs in the UK, where biases can overshadow the well-being of individuals facing genuine threats.

In light of these events, it is clear that Harry’s battle for security is not just a personal struggle but a reflection of broader societal issues.

The royal family’s actions—or lack thereof—have drawn scrutiny and criticism, forcing many to reconsider what it means to protect those in vulnerable positions.

As this story unfolds, it will be interesting to see how the royal family responds to the mounting pressure and public outcry.

The stakes are high, not just for the Sussexes but for the integrity of the institution itself.

The conversation surrounding their treatment is far from over, and many are eager to see what comes next.