In a surprising turn of events, the Home Office and Parliament have come together to deliver a devastating blow to Sussex, as they reject the security call and strip them of their titles.

A recent tweet claims that Parliament will suspend titles for individuals living abroad, putting an end to any discussions revolving around the royal family.

This decision serves a dual purpose, as it prevents those who choose to distance themselves from royal duties and move overseas from exploiting their royal status.

Harry and Meghan will no longer be able to hold Buckingham Palace hostage or play the victim card regarding their royal titles and their children’s alleged royal status.

This fair move by the government aligns with the actions taken by other European monarchies, which have downsized due to taxpayer complaints.

Princess Mako Komuro, for instance, is thriving in her non-titled life in New York City, while Princess Madeline has returned to Sweden, knowing where her true interests lie.

The government’s decision to prioritize the health of pandemic-stricken treasuries and address global issues such as wars and natural disasters, rather than catering to non-working royal grifters, is justified in this current economic climate.

Whoopi Goldberg, during a segment on The View, criticized the Sussex spokesperson for using the word “chase,” noting that it implies high-speed action, which is not necessarily the case.

Such verbiage undermines credibility, especially among New Yorkers who know that things don’t move that fast in reality.

Meanwhile, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are awaiting the outcome of their second legal challenge against the Home Office regarding their security arrangements while in the UK.

Prince Harry is seeking permission from the High Court to initiate a judicial review of the decision that he should not be allowed to privately fund his protective security.

This legal action is one of five civil cases pursued by the Duke in London.

The Home Office, in opposition to Harry’s claim, argues that it is inappropriate for wealthy individuals to purchase protective security, including armed officers, when the public interest does not warrant such publicly funded protection.

The Metropolitan Police, also involved in the case, supports this stance, stating that it is unreasonable for a private individual to pay for police officers’ presence, as this is not how policing typically operates.

Mr. Justice Chamberlain will deliver his ruling on Tuesday at 10:30 AM.

This legal challenge follows a previous claim made by Harry against the Home Office, where he was informed that his level of personal protective security would be reduced during his visits to the UK.

A full hearing on this matter, which focuses on Ravec’s decision-making process, is yet to take place, despite receiving approval last summer.

In addition to the legal battles, Conservative MP Bob Sealy intends to present a private members bill to the House of Commons, seeking to revoke the couple’s titles.

It is evident that Harry and Meghan have been leveraging their victim status to make outlandish claims, and now they are facing the consequences of disregarding both the law and morality.

It seems inevitable that their titles will be stripped, and the need for security requirements will be eliminated.

The Home Office and Parliament’s joint decision marks a significant turning point in the ongoing saga surrounding the Sussexes.

As the legal battles continue and public opinion shifts, it remains to be seen how this chapter will unfold and what lies ahead for Harry and Meghan.