In a dazzling display of style at the much-anticipated wedding of the Duke of Westminster, Princess Eugenie made headlines not just for her fashion but also for what it might signify regarding Meghan Markle’s absence.

The royal wedding, which united Hugh Grosvenor and Olivia Henson, became a focal point for discussions surrounding the ongoing tensions within the royal family, particularly between Prince William and Prince Harry.

Eugenie turned heads in a striking green dress paired with a chic white fascinator.

Many observers noted that her outfit bore a resemblance to Meghan Markle’s signature looks, suggesting a subtle nod to her cousin Harry’s wife, who was conspicuously missing from the guest list.

This choice of attire seemed deliberate, as Eugenie opted for elegant Aquazzura pumps that echoed those previously worn by Markle, further fueling speculation about the underlying dynamics at play.

The absence of Meghan Markle at such a prominent event raised eyebrows, especially given her close ties to the groom.

Reports indicate that Meghan was not invited, which many see as indicative of the unresolved rift between the Sussexes and the rest of the royal family.

This wedding, dubbed the “Society Wedding of the Year,” provided a backdrop for royal watchers to dissect the complex relationships within the monarchy.

Royal biographer Ingrid Seward weighed in, asserting that it was expected for Prince William to take center stage at the wedding.

His role as usher highlighted his position within the family, contrasting sharply with Harry’s decision to skip the event altogether.

According to Seward, Harry had come to a mutual understanding with the Duke of Westminster, allowing him to bow out gracefully while ensuring William could fully participate.

The guest list boasted around 400 attendees, yet the absence of King Charles III was also noted due to his ongoing cancer treatment and commitments related to D-Day celebrations.

This added another layer of complexity to an already fraught family dynamic, as royal commentator Michael Cole pointed out that Harry’s absence underscores the ongoing feud between the brothers.

Cole remarked that the situation suggests a level of discomfort that makes it challenging for Harry and William to coexist in social settings.

Despite the distance, he speculated that Harry and Meghan would likely send their best wishes from their home in Montecito, California, framing Harry’s absence as a diplomatic resolution to a familial issue.

Host Nana Akua expressed sadness over the deepening rift, emphasizing that what once might have been fodder for sibling banter has now transformed into serious headline news.

The weight of the situation was palpable, as royal experts reflected on how the bond between the brothers has deteriorated over time.

Adding to the conversation, royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams noted that Harry’s absence was somewhat predictable.

He pointed out that Harry and Meghan have largely distanced themselves from royal events, choosing instead to focus on their life in California.

Fitzwilliams suggested that Harry must feel genuine regret for missing the wedding, particularly given his longstanding friendship with the groom.

The expert further highlighted that William’s role as usher likely contributed to Harry’s decision to stay away.

The notion that Harry felt unable to attend due to the presence of his brother illustrates the profound impact of their estrangement.

Fitzwilliams emphasized that the rift appears to be widening, underscoring the challenges that lie ahead for the royal family.

As the dust settles from this high-profile wedding, the implications of Eugenie’s fashion choices and the absence of Meghan Markle continue to resonate.