The Princess of Wales, Catherine, recently made headlines with an outing that shed light on a significant difference between her and her sister-in-law, Meghan.

While visiting Hope Street, a center for women in the justice system, Catherine added a handwritten note to a tree of hope, which contained messages for the residents.

The note, which read “I see you and I am with you.

Good luck in all that lies ahead, Catherine,” was seen as a personal and supportive gesture.

However, it also drew comparisons to a similar act by Meghan four years ago, which received mixed reactions.

In 2019, Meghan and Harry visited 125, a charity that supports women escaping s** work, addiction, and homelessness.

During their visit, Meghan asked for a Sharpie marker and wrote affirmations on bananas intended to empower the women.

While Meghan’s gesture was well-intentioned, it faced backlash from some who felt it was superficial and performative.

A s** worker named Nikki criticized the act, stating that Meghan had the means to offer more substantial help.

The contrasting responses to Catherine and Meghan’s gestures highlight a key difference in their approaches to charity work.

Catherine’s note was planned and part of her lifelong commitment to improving the lives of children and families in Britain.

She focuses on providing support for parents and caregivers, aiming to create happier and emotionally healthier individuals.

Her work addresses issues such as mental health, addiction, and homelessness.

On the other hand, Meghan’s banana message seemed impulsive and lacked a broader plan.

It was seen as a well-meaning but ultimately superficial act.

This difference in approach reflects the importance of meaningful and intentional projects for members of the royal family.

Diana, Princess of Wales, understood this concept well, realizing that the monarchy needed to stand for something real and play a genuinely significant role in public life.

For Catherine and Nikki, token gestures from the royal family are not enough.

They emphasize the need for practical and tangible efforts to bring about real change.

While Meghan’s banana messages may have been intended to uplift women, they ultimately went unnoticed as the fruit was used for cakes instead.

This serves as a reminder that substance and long-term impact are crucial in charity work.

Interestingly, Catherine’s note received some criticism on social media, with people pointing out the similarities between her message and Meghan’s banana affirmations.

However, it is important to note that Catherine’s note was planned and considerate, while Meghan’s act seemed spontaneous and lacking in depth.

Ultimately, Catherine’s approach to charity work aligns with the late Queen’s perspective, who once questioned Diana’s involvement with HIV and AIDS patients.

The royal family has evolved over the years, focusing on causes that may not always be pleasant but are essential for making a meaningful difference.

Catherine’s commitment to improving early years support reflects this evolution.

In conclusion, the contrasting responses to Catherine and Meghan’s gestures highlight the importance of intentional and well-thought-out charity work.

While Meghan’s act faced criticism for its superficiality, Catherine’s note demonstrated her dedication to creating positive change.

Substance and long-term impact should always take precedence over token gestures, as the royal family strives to play a genuine and meaningful role in society.