In a recent BBC interview, a tabloid editor was asked whether Prince Harry still has the right to be upset about the media’s past actions against him.

The response from Victoria Newton, who has a controversial history herself, raised eyebrows and sparked outrage among many viewers.

She suggested that Harry’s anger was misplaced, arguing that he should have moved on after all the therapy he has undergone.

However, this perspective overlooks the deep-rooted issues that Harry has faced throughout his life.

Newton’s remarks came as a shock, especially considering her involvement in phone hacking and other illegal activities that are part of the ongoing lawsuit involving Prince Harry against the media.

Her claim that Harry should not be angry seems not only dismissive but also hypocritical, given her role in the very offenses that have caused him pain.

Many believe that Harry’s feelings of anger are entirely justified, considering the media’s relentless pursuit of his family.

The core of the issue lies in the trauma that Harry experienced due to the media’s actions.

He lost his mother, Princess Diana, at a young age, victimized by the same press that now continues to hound him.

How can anyone expect him not to feel anger towards those who contributed to such a tragic loss?

The media’s behavior has not improved; it has evolved into a cycle of bullying that extends to his wife, Meghan Markle, and their children.

Harry’s frustration is not merely a personal grievance; it represents a broader fight against an intrusive media culture that has shown little regard for the well-being of individuals.

The relentless scrutiny he and Meghan faced, particularly during her pregnancy, pushed her to a breaking point.

This is not just about Harry; it’s about protecting his family from further harm.

Newton’s comments, including her defense of Jeremy Clarkson’s inflammatory article suggesting Meghan should be paraded n-ked, highlight a troubling mindset within the media.

Such rhetoric is not only damaging but also indicative of a larger problem where accountability is rarely acknowledged.

For Harry, the anger is not just a personal vendetta; it’s a reaction to a system that refuses to take responsibility for its actions.

The media’s response to Harry’s legal battles has been one of disbelief.

They seem outraged that a prince would dare to challenge them in court, especially when he has found success in exposing their unethical practices.

This unexpected turn of events has only fueled their animosity toward him.

They appear to be hoping that public attacks will intimidate him into silence, but Harry shows no signs of backing down.

Moreover, the notion that therapy would erase Harry’s anger is misguided.

Therapy can help individuals process their experiences but does not negate the impact of past trauma.

Harry’s fight against the media is not just for himself but also for others who have suffered in silence.

By standing up, he is paving the way for those who feel powerless against the press.

Many people are expressing their outrage over the BBC’s decision to give a platform to someone like Newton.

Critics have pointed out the hypocrisy of allowing a tabloid editor to comment on Harry’s situation without addressing her own complicity in the media’s wrongdoings.

The public sentiment is clear: people are tired of the media’s double standards and lack of accountability.

Social media reactions have been swift and furious.

Viewers have condemned the BBC for allowing someone with a history of unethical behavior to speak against Harry.

Comments reflect a growing frustration with the media’s refusal to acknowledge its past mistakes and its continued harassment of public figures.

As the narrative unfolds, it becomes increasingly evident that Harry’s legal actions are about more than just personal grievances.

They symbolize a fight for justice and accountability in a media landscape that often prioritizes sensationalism over truth.

The public is beginning to recognize the importance of this struggle, not just for Harry but for anyone who has been wronged by the press.

In essence, Harry’s anger is a reflection of the pain inflicted by a media that has, time and again, crossed ethical boundaries.

His journey is emblematic of the broader fight against media malpractice, and it resonates with many who have felt similarly victimized.

The question remains: will the media ever learn from its mistakes, or will it continue to perpetuate a cycle of harm?

As the story evolves, one thing is clear: Prince Harry is committed to seeking justice, and the public is watching closely.