Mary Tillman, the mother of fallen soldier Pat Tillman, has expressed her outrage at the decision to honor Prince Harry with an award established in her son’s memory.

The announcement that Harry will receive this accolade at the upcoming EPSY Awards in Hollywood has ignited a firestorm of controversy, particularly among those who believe the recognition should go to someone more deserving.

In her candid remarks, Mary Tillman revealed she was not consulted about the decision, stating, “I am shocked as to why they would select such a controversial and divisive individual to receive the award.” Her disappointment echoes a growing sentiment that there are veterans more worthy of recognition, individuals who tirelessly support their peers without the privilege that comes with Harry’s fame and fortune.

Pat Tillman, who tragically lost his life due to friendly fire in Afghanistan, is remembered for his extraordinary sacrifice.

He famously turned down a lucrative NFL contract to enlist in the Army following the events of September 11, 2001.

His bravery earned him the Silver Star and Purple Heart, making his legacy one of duty and honor.

The backlash against the decision has manifested in a petition on Change.org, which has garnered nearly 30,000 signatures.

The petition articulates a heartfelt plea for the award to honor those who truly encapsulate the values Pat Tillman stood for—dedication, loyalty, and sacrifice.

The author of the petition argues that awarding Prince Harry undermines these principles and disrespects Tillman’s legacy.

Critics point to Harry’s military service, which spanned a decade, and his establishment of the Invictus Games as noteworthy contributions.

However, many feel that his recent public statements about his time in the military have raised serious questions about his suitability for such a prestigious honor.

Some accuse him of compromising the safety of his comrades by revealing sensitive details about his experiences.

The petition continues to gain traction, with signatories sharing personal stories that highlight their discontent.

Emily, a signer, expressed her disbelief that someone who “walked away from duty and country” could be honored in this way.

Patricia added that there are countless wounded warriors in the U.S. who deserve the recognition far more than Harry does.

Stacey, another supporter of the petition, emphasized her family’s military history, questioning whether a British citizen like Harry should receive an American award named after an American hero.

The overwhelming sentiment among those signing the petition is clear: many feel that Prince Harry does not embody the values associated with the Pat Tillman Award.

While it’s important to acknowledge Harry’s military background and philanthropic efforts, criticism surrounding the Invictus Games has also surfaced.

Reports suggest that around 2,000 veterans have distanced themselves from the initiative, claiming it has strayed from its original mission and become overly influenced by royal connections.

Despite the criticism, experts believe Prince Harry may not take the backlash seriously.

However, given the strong feelings expressed by veterans and their families, it might be wise for him to reconsider how this award reflects upon both him and the Tillman legacy.

What stands out most in this situation is Mary Tillman’s absence from the conversation.

Many argue that she should have been consulted before the award was announced, especially considering the profound connection she has to her son’s legacy.

A broader discussion involving veterans and their families could have provided valuable insights into the implications of such a decision.

As the debate rages on, the question remains: should Prince Harry accept the award in light of the criticism?

Or should he take a step back and allow the recognition to go to someone who truly represents the spirit of Pat Tillman?

The dialogue continues, and it’s clear that many people are eager to share their thoughts on this contentious issue.