In a whirlwind of revelations, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle find themselves grappling with yet another staffing crisis.

The recent resignation of their Chief of Staff, Josh Kettler, has sparked intense speculation about the couple’s internal dynamics.

Kettler, who spent just three months in the role, left under circumstances that have raised eyebrows and questions.

His departure marks a troubling milestone for the Sussexes, as Kettler becomes the 18th staff member to exit their team within a few years.

Initially, he was seen as the perfect person to help navigate Harry’s transition into a new phase of life, especially during their high-profile engagements.

However, despite the optimism surrounding his appointment, Kettler’s time with the couple was notably brief.

While a spokesperson for the Sussexes opted to remain silent on the matter, an anonymous source shared with People magazine that Kettler’s hiring was on a trial basis.

This suggests that both parties agreed it simply wasn’t the right match.

Yet, skepticism surrounds this explanation, as many wonder if it truly reflects the reality of the situation.

Richard Eden from the Daily Mail has pointed out the irony of the Sussexes’ predicament.

Harry and Meghan have previously criticized the use of anonymous briefings, labeling them as relics of the very palace methods they aimed to escape.

Eden argues that their current reliance on such briefings feels disingenuous, particularly given their public commitment to transparency.

The notion that Kettler’s role was merely temporary raises further questions.

Eden contends that his position was no more fleeting than other appointments made by the couple.

Kettler’s significance was evident during key events, such as the quasi-royal tour in Nigeria and the St Paul’s Cathedral service for the Invictus Games’ 10th anniversary, where he was often seen at Harry’s side.

The term “mutual” used to describe Kettler’s exit is also contentious.

Eden highlights that the Sussexes previously employed this same terminology when discussing their split with Spotify, leading to doubts about the consistency of their narratives.

A source close to Kettler revealed that he found the role uncomfortable and preferred to leave rather than endure an unenjoyable position.

Adding fuel to the fire are shocking allegations surrounding Meghan Markle.

Rumors have surfaced suggesting that she may have orchestrated a staged kidnapping during their visit to Colombia.

Sources claim this dramatic incident could have been intended to secure continued UK taxpayer-funded security for the couple.

This allegation emerges amidst Prince Harry’s ongoing legal battle with the UK government concerning his personal security detail.

Harry has argued that returning to the UK without proper protection poses a significant risk to him and his family.

If these kidnapping rumors hold any truth, they could complicate the Sussexes’ already strained relationship with the British public and authorities.

The timing of Kettler’s resignation, occurring just before the Colombia trip, has only intensified speculation.

Some suggest that Kettler might have been aware of the alleged kidnapping plot and chose to distance himself from the brewing controversy.

As the Sussexes navigate this tangled web of staffing issues, instability, and alarming allegations, their public narrative grows ever more dramatic.

With Kettler now part of the so-called “Sussex Survivors Squad,” a group of former staff who have left the couple’s employment, the future of Harry and Meghan’s endeavors—and how they will be perceived—remains under a microscope.