Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have embarked on their much-publicized tour of Colombia, but the reception has been anything but warm.

As they made their entrance, it became clear that some locals were not thrilled about their presence.

In fact, audible boos rang out from the crowd, signaling a frosty welcome that the royal couple likely did not anticipate.

This lukewarm response highlights a growing discontent among Colombians regarding the couple’s visit.

Social media has erupted with criticism, particularly aimed at Colombian Vice President Francia Marquez, who extended the invitation to the Sussexes.

Many citizens expressed their frustration on platforms like X, questioning the rationale behind inviting a couple perceived as a distraction from the more pressing issues facing the nation.

Royal expert Robert Jobson captured the essence of local sentiments, voicing the confusion surrounding the visit.

He posed the question of whether Harry and Meghan were there to genuinely help or simply to bask in the celebrity spotlight.

Jobson’s remarks resonate with many Colombians who feel that the couple’s arrival is more about drawing attention than addressing serious concerns.

Their visit, rather than being seen as a helping hand, is viewed as a shiny diversion from the real challenges that Colombia grapples with daily.

Moreover, the public is left wondering who is footing the bill for their extravagant security measures and luxurious accommodations.

In a surprising twist, Vice President Marquez defended her decision to invite the Sussexes, citing her emotional connection to their story as portrayed in a Netflix series.

She asserted that Meghan deserved the opportunity to share her narrative in Colombia.

However, this justification raises eyebrows, especially given the country’s ongoing struggles with drug-related violence and kidnapping.

The security measures surrounding the Sussexes have been extensive, with police cars and armed soldiers creating a fortified perimeter around them.

Local residents have faced roadblocks and detours, complicating their daily lives as they navigate the heightened security.

This situation has become even more precarious due to threats against Vice President Marquez, further complicating the already tense atmosphere.

Adding to the controversy, Harry and Meghan have openly shared their detailed itinerary with the public.

Critics argue that this move not only jeopardizes their own safety but also reflects a troubling trend of prioritizing publicity over practical security measures.

Their actions seem to contradict their stated concerns about safety, raising questions about their true intentions.

During their time in Colombia, the Sussexes are set to engage with various organizations and youth groups, continuing their work with the Archibald Foundation.

They plan to participate in an insight session at a local school, which appears to be meticulously crafted to enhance their public image.

Yet, some skeptics dismiss these engagements as mere window dressing for a broader agenda.

Their itinerary also includes a summit with experts and activists focused on promoting positive online environments.

While this initiative sounds commendable, critics are wary.

They argue that the couple’s commitment to digital civility may be less about fostering genuine change and more about silencing dissenting voices.

As the Sussexes navigate this complex landscape, their actions often seem at odds with their public statements, fueling ongoing debates about their motivations.

The juxtaposition of their celebrity status against the backdrop of Colombia’s realities leaves many questioning the sincerity of their visit.