The much-anticipated visit of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to Colombia has quickly turned into a spectacle filled with controversy and criticism.

Initially announced with great enthusiasm, this unofficial tour is said to be at the invitation of Colombia’s Vice President, Francia Marquez.

However, as the days pass, it seems their diplomatic mission is less about fostering genuine connections and more about polishing their royal image.

Vice President Marquez made a splashy announcement, proclaiming that the Duke and Duchess would be visiting iconic cities like Bogota, Cartagena, and Cali.

Yet, many are questioning whether Colombia was merely chosen as a backdrop for another round of royal duties, following their previous controversial trip to Nigeria.

The optics of this visit have raised eyebrows, especially given Harry’s reluctance to return to the UK due to alleged safety concerns.

Critics, such as royal author Angela Levin, have been vocal about the Sussexes’ questionable choices.

Levin didn’t mince words when discussing Harry’s decision to travel to Colombia, especially considering his ongoing legal battles regarding security in the UK.

She argues that his claims of safety risks at home seem rather absurd when juxtaposed with their willingness to visit a country she describes as dangerous and prone to ransom demands.

Levin has long accused the couple of trying to manipulate King Charles, and this trip only reinforces her viewpoint.

She stated that Harry’s insistence on top-tier security appears to be a facade for his disdain for anything less than luxurious.

This attitude seems to extend to their Colombian adventure, where expectations of grandeur are reportedly clashing with local hospitality norms.

Adding fuel to the fire, rumors have emerged that the Colombian government has denied the Sussexes’ request for five-star accommodations.

This rejection has sparked a conversation about the couple’s sense of entitlement, as they appear to believe their royal status guarantees them the highest level of luxury.

The Colombian authorities opted for standard practices instead, leading to a public debate about what is considered reasonable for a royal visit.

Meghan Markle is no stranger to controversy, often criticized for her lavish tastes and extravagant lifestyle.

From her designer wardrobe to her preference for private jets, she has faced backlash for being out of touch with everyday realities.

The unfolding situation in Colombia only amplifies these perceptions, showcasing her penchant for luxury amidst growing scrutiny.

During her time as a working royal, Meghan frequently faced criticism for her fashion choices and travel habits.

This latest hotel saga serves as yet another glaring example of her ostentatious lifestyle, raising questions about her connection to the average person.

As discussions around the hotel debacle continue, many wonder how the couple will respond to this unexpected turn of events.

Speculation runs rampant regarding whether Harry and Meghan might cancel their trip altogether if their accommodation demands aren’t met.

On the flip side, some believe they may begrudgingly accept the Colombian government’s terms and attempt to make the best of the situation.

Regardless of their choice, the entire episode underscores the ongoing tension between the Sussexes and public perceptions of their royal standing.

As they navigate their post-royal lives, Harry and Meghan’s efforts to maintain a royal image while living an extravagant lifestyle will likely continue to invite scrutiny.

Their journey in Colombia is shaping up to be more than just a diplomatic visit; it’s becoming a case study in the complexities of modern royalty and public expectations.