Meghan Markle Under Fire for Forgetting Emails in Court Case

In a surprising turn of events, Meghan Markle is facing criticism for claiming she couldn’t remember certain emails that were later presented in court.

The Duchess of Sussex has consistently denied any involvement in the creation of the controversial biography, Finding Freedom.

However, emails shown during the trial indicate that she and Prince Harry extensively briefed their press spokesman, Jason Knauf, before his meeting with the book’s authors, Omid Scobie and Carolyn Durand, two years ago.

Renowned royal biographer Angela Levin weighed in on the matter, stating that Meghan is known for her meticulous nature and attention to detail.

Levin questioned how someone with such a keen focus could conveniently forget the significant impact that Finding Freedom had on her relationship with her father and the entire royal family, unless there were compelling reasons to do so.

Yesterday, Meghan issued an apology to the Court of Appeal for not previously mentioning these emails in her ongoing privacy case against the Mail on Sunday.

The newspaper had published contents of a letter she had written to her father.

Meghan admitted, “I did not have the benefit of seeing these emails, and I apologized to the court for not remembering these exchanges at the time.”

It was also revealed that Meghan had prepared five bullet points and 31 reminders, which she believed would be helpful to her case.

According to Angela Levin, even from these notes, it was evident that Meghan paid meticulous attention to every detail.

She numbered the documents she provided to Knauf, ensuring that no one could add any additional information.

Additionally, she concluded each page with an incomplete sentence to prevent any alterations.

Angela Levin believes that Meghan is downplaying the significance of the new evidence emerging from her court battle with the Mail on Sunday.

She warns that the revelations made by former aide Jason Knauf during the High Court proceedings could cause serious damage to Meghan’s reputation.

Ms. Levin expressed her astonishment at the fact that palace aides are now speaking out about their views, contrary to the Queen’s motto of never complaining or explaining.

Levin claims that Meghan is dismissing Knauf’s evidence as if it holds no weight.

However, she asserts that within the court setting, the evidence is indeed significant.

According to Levin, Meghan’s credibility will suffer greatly due to the discrepancies between her court statement and the truth.

Furthermore, Levin suggests that the Duchess is desperate to avoid losing the case against the publisher.

She describes Meghan as someone who dislikes being defeated and always strives to come out on top.

Levin adds that Meghan tends to overlook details and refuses to listen to others, preferring to forge ahead with her own agenda.

During the trial, Mr. Knauf revealed a list of talking points that Meghan had wanted him to share with the authors of Finding Freedom.

These included minimal contact with her half-siblings during her childhood, her close relationship with her father despite his reclusiveness, the pressure from the media that affected him, and her happiness about moving to Windsor.

Meghan also wanted to clarify the selection process for her wedding tiara, which she felt had been misrepresented by the media.

As the court case unfolds, the spotlight remains on Meghan Markle and the revelations surrounding her alleged involvement in Finding Freedom.

The outcome of this legal battle could have significant implications for her reputation and public perception.