The recent visit by Meghan Markle and Prince Harry to Colombia has sparked a flurry of speculation about the authenticity of their public displays of affection.

Since stepping back from their royal duties in 2020, the couple appears keen on maintaining an image reminiscent of their former royal life.

Their trip began with a breakfast meeting with Colombia’s Vice President, Francia Marquez, and her husband, Rafael Yerney Pinillo, in the bustling capital of Bogota.

Dressed in a lavish £598 Orlinda vest by designer Veronica Beard, Meghan certainly made a statement.

Meanwhile, Harry looked dapper in a tailored navy suit, showcasing his protective instincts as he wrapped an arm around Meghan.

Yet, their seemingly affectionate gestures raised eyebrows among onlookers who questioned the sincerity behind them.

Lip-reading expert Nicola Hickling noted a curious exchange between the couple as they exited a building.

Meghan purportedly whispered “Hand” to Harry, who quickly responded with “Here you go.”

This interaction felt staged to many, leading to the perception that their relationship dynamics might not be as genuine as they appear.

Some observers even suggested that Meghan’s command resembled a parent instructing a child, prompting questions about the balance of power in their relationship.

For someone who identifies as a feminist, Meghan’s behavior seems somewhat contradictory.

Her apparent need for constant attention from Harry paints a picture of dependency, raising concerns about whether Harry has become a pawn in Meghan’s carefully crafted narrative.

The notion that he could be likened to a well-trained dog responding to commands is unsettling for those who remember him as a free-spirited prince.

Harry’s transformation into someone who appears to have surrendered his identity to Meghan’s desires has ignited discussions about his overall wellbeing.

Recent events surrounding the tragic passing of actor Matthew Perry have added a layer of complexity to this dialogue, highlighting the dangers of misplaced trust in close relationships.

Can Harry genuinely rely on Meghan, the person he chose to share his life with?

The couple’s itinerary included a visit to the Collegio Cultura Popular, a school for children in Bogota.

While there, Harry attempted to win over the audience by counting in Spanish and sharing anecdotes about their children, Archie and Lilibet.

However, a slip in his phrasing caught the attention of many when he stated, “I’ve young children and they’re not on social media.”

Harry’s choice of words, particularly the absence of “we” when discussing his children, hinted at a potential disconnect in their family dynamic.

It raises questions about Meghan’s influence and involvement in their lives.

His comments about controlling their children’s exposure to social media drew mixed reactions, with some finding it laughable in today’s digital age.

Despite their packed schedule, Meghan and Harry’s Colombian tour continues to raise more questions than it resolves.

Invited by Vice President Marquez, their agenda includes meetings with various leaders and discussions on critical issues like cyberbullying.

Yet, amidst the smiles and handshakes, it’s hard not to wonder how much of this is authentic and how much is part of a carefully orchestrated performance meant to sustain their brand.

As they navigate their way through Colombia, the couple’s actions serve as a stark reminder that with Meghan and Harry, appearances can be deceiving.

The ongoing scrutiny of their relationship dynamics and public persona suggests that the world is watching closely, eager to decipher the reality behind the royal glamour.