Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s recent tour of Colombia has sparked a flurry of debate about the authenticity of their public displays of affection.

Since stepping back from their royal duties in 2020, the couple seems intent on maintaining an image of royal glamour, but many are questioning just how real it all is.

Their trip kicked off with a breakfast meeting alongside Colombia’s Vice President, Francia Marquez, and her husband, Rafael Yaponio, in the bustling capital of Bogota.

From the start, Meghan made headlines with her fashion choice—a luxurious Zorlinda vest by designer Veronica Beard, priced at a staggering £598.

Meanwhile, Harry looked every bit the devoted husband in a tailored navy suit, showing his protective side by wrapping an arm around Meghan.

Yet, this affectionate gesture raised eyebrows among onlookers.

Lip-reading expert Nicola Hickling pointed out a curious exchange between the couple as they exited a building.

Meghan reportedly whispered a simple command to Harry, saying “Hand,” to which he promptly replied, “Here you go.” This moment felt staged to many, reinforcing suspicions that their interactions are more performative than genuine.

The way Meghan instructed Harry to take her hand resembled a parent directing a child, leading some to wonder if Harry has become a compliant figure under Meghan’s guidance.

For someone who identifies as a feminist, Meghan’s behavior might seem contradictory—demanding her husband’s constant attention rather than embodying empowerment.

Critics argue that Harry appears to be playing a role scripted by Meghan, reminiscent of a well-trained pet responding to commands.

It raises a poignant question: has Harry, once a spirited prince, surrendered his identity to the whims of his wife?

Observers have noted that his seemingly submissive demeanor toward Meghan has sparked discussions about his overall well-being.

Recent events, such as the tragic passing of actor Matthew Perry’s assistant, have highlighted the dangers of misplaced trust, making one wonder if Harry can genuinely rely on those closest to him.

Following their breakfast meeting, the couple visited Colegio Cultura Popular, a children’s school in Bogota.

Harry attempted to engage with the crowd by counting in Spanish and sharing anecdotes about his children, Archie and Lilibet.

However, a slip in his phrasing caught people’s attention.

When he said, “I have young children, and they’re not on social media,” the absence of “we” raised eyebrows, hinting at a potential disconnect in their family dynamic.

Harry’s comments about parenting drew mixed responses.

Some found his attempts to control his kids’ social media exposure amusing, especially given the realities of raising children in today’s digital landscape.

It seems Harry, now living in America, is under the illusion that he can shield his children from social media’s pervasive influence.

Despite their packed schedule, Meghan and Harry’s tour in Colombia continues to leave more questions than answers.

Invited by Vice President Marquez, their agenda includes meetings with various leaders and discussions on significant issues like cyberbullying.

But amid the smiles and handshakes, it’s hard not to wonder how much of this is sincere and how much is a meticulously crafted performance to sustain their brand.

As they navigate their post-royal lives, the Colombian tour serves as a potent reminder that with Meghan and Harry, appearances can be deceiving.

The world watches closely, waiting to see whether their actions reflect genuine connection or simply a carefully curated image.