In a surprising twist in royal affairs, a recent poll has sparked a heated discussion regarding the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

Conservative MP Bob Seeley has introduced a bill aimed at stripping Prince Harry and Meghan Markle of their royal titles.

This move comes as a response to a significant public sentiment reflected in a poll conducted by the Express, which revealed that a staggering 96% of respondents are in favor of revoking the couple’s titles.

The proposed legislation seeks to amend the 1917 Titles Deprivation Act, a historical law that was previously used to remove titles from members of the German royal family during World War I. Seeley’s initiative to present this private Member’s Bill in Parliament has ignited a firestorm of opinions, especially since the Sussexes have been vocal critics of various British institutions since stepping back from royal duties in 2020.

Despite their departure from royal responsibilities, Harry and Meghan have retained their titles, which were granted to them on their wedding day by Queen Elizabeth II nearly five years ago.

However, the current political climate suggests that many believe the couple should have lost these titles when they decided to step away from their royal roles.

The overwhelming support for stripping the Sussexes of their titles is echoed in the comments section of the Express article, with numerous readers expressing that the couple should no longer hold such honors.

Some even propose that any royal who opts to leave the UK should automatically forfeit their title, indicating a desire for stricter regulations surrounding royal privileges.

Yet, not everyone is on board with Seeley’s proposal.

Critics warn that introducing such a law could set a dangerous precedent, potentially impacting other members of the royal family.

The concern is that this legislation could inadvertently threaten the very institution it aims to protect, leading to broader implications for the monarchy itself.

As the debate rages on, supporters of the bill argue that revoking the titles is essential for maintaining the integrity and reputation of the royal family.

They believe that allowing the Sussexes to retain their titles while criticizing the monarchy undermines the institution’s values.

Conversely, opponents of the bill contend that the move is divisive and unnecessary.

They caution against the potential fallout that could arise from stripping royal titles, suggesting that it might lead to unintended consequences that could harm the monarchy’s image more than help it.

The power to grant or revoke royal titles ultimately resides with the monarch, but any changes must be enacted through Parliament.

Thus, the fate of the Sussexes’ titles hinges on whether Mr. Seeley’s bill can garner sufficient support among lawmakers.

If the bill passes, it would mark a significant moment in British history, as it would be the first instance of a royal title being revoked in modern times.

This potential shift raises questions about the future of royal titles and the criteria that govern them.

As the public continues to weigh in on this contentious issue, the next steps remain uncertain.

Will Parliament take action, or will the Sussexes continue to hold onto their titles amidst the growing backlash?

For now, the royal saga unfolds, leaving many eager to see how this drama plays out in the coming weeks.

The conversation is far from over, and public opinion will likely play a crucial role in determining the outcome.