Is the Carlisle Hotel, one of Princess Diana’s beloved establishments in beautiful New York City, bidding farewell to its association with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle?

It seems that the hotel may be relieved that the couple opted to stay at Gail King’s residence a few blocks away, following Markle’s recent award ceremony.

According to reports, during their previous stay, the Sussexes exhibited rude behavior towards the hotel staff.

The employees were strictly instructed not to approach them unless spoken to first.

Moreover, the rooms they occupied, where they allegedly slept separately, were left in disarray, and their loud arguments and excessive drinking disturbed other guests.

To exacerbate matters, the couple deliberately posed for photographs in the hotel’s restaurant, much to the displeasure of the management.

Consequently, it is unlikely that they will be welcomed back anytime soon.

In their deluded sense of entitlement, they even expected a discounted suite rate.

Such atrocious and entitled behavior is utterly uncalled for, especially when dealing with hotel staff whose purpose is to ensure a pleasant stay.

Undoubtedly, the well-trained and polite staff at the Carlisle Hotel deserved better treatment.

One staff member disclosed that the Harkles caused further annoyance by taking pictures in the hotel’s dining room and engaging in drunken brawls that disrupted fellow guests.

It is not far-fetched to believe that they left their suites in such a state that it required additional time and money to restore the damaged items.

Perhaps even the carpet had to be repainted, repaired, or replaced.

However, even these actions could be forgiven if they compensated adequately.

However, taking pictures in the restaurant crossed a line.

The couple’s swift denial of the allegations in the newspapers only adds credibility to the claims.

It is highly likely that a staff member, exhausted from tolerating their behavior, or one of their own disgruntled staff members, leaked the story, hoping for a speedy divorce.

San Vicente Bungalows have also banned the Sussexes.

This exclusive establishment caters to a discerning clientele and values client discretion and tranquility.

It is evident that the couple deliberately summoned the paparazzi to an establishment that prioritizes privacy.

According to a source, the bungalows, located a two-hour drive from the Sussexes’ $15 million Montecito home, were seen as a getaway spot for the 38-year-old prince.

Reports about this alleged hideaway surfaced after the couple’s fifth wedding anniversary, which they curiously failed to commemorate publicly.

The post reached out to San Vicente Bungalows for comment, but the resort adheres to a strict policy of non-disclosure regarding its members and guests’ activities.

Additionally, guests are prohibited from approaching or disturbing other members, as stated in the hotel’s FAQ page.

Prospective members must pay an annual fee of nearly $4,000 and undergo a vetting process by existing members.

However, unable to tolerate Harry’s disruptive behavior towards other guests any longer, the bungalows’ owner decided to reveal the truth to the tabloids, hoping that Harry would depart.