In a recent segment on GB News, the ongoing tensions between Prince Harry, Meghan Markle, and the royal family took center stage, igniting a flurry of reactions from viewers.

Biographer Angela Vinn made waves with her strong opinions about the couple’s behavior, particularly in light of King Charles’ upcoming coronation.

Her remarks have sparked a heated debate, revealing deep divisions among royal watchers.

Angela Vinn, known for her candid assessments, didn’t hold back.

She expressed her belief that Prince William is “absolutely furious” with Harry for his public revelations and perceived disregard for family privacy.

According to Vinn, Harry’s actions are not just a breach of trust but also a source of humiliation for the royal family.

She argued that an apology from Harry is long overdue, suggesting that his continued antics are damaging to family ties.

The biographer’s comments didn’t stop there.

She pointed out that Harry’s irritation has escalated, especially after Lady Hussie’s recent upset, which led to an apology directed her way.

Vinn insisted that Harry’s grievances shouldn’t be tied to this incident, emphasizing that one situation does not warrant another apology.

This assertion only added fuel to the fire of public opinion.

Vinn further critiqued the couple’s approach to royal events, claiming they seem incapable of planning their schedules without receiving formal invitations.

She alleged that Harry’s motivations are rooted in a desire to assert control over his family’s narrative, suggesting he has adopted a bullying demeanor in recent years.

Her assertion that Harry’s attempts to reform the royal family are “delusional” raised eyebrows and intensified the discussion.

When asked about Meghan’s potential attendance at the coronation, Vinn was quick to dismiss the idea.

She suggested that Meghan has no intention of participating, highlighting the couple’s ongoing struggles between their royal obligations and their new life in America.

This tension, according to Vinn, leaves Harry caught in a conflict between his affection for his father and his frustrations with his current circumstances.

Viewers were quick to respond to Vinn’s comments, taking to Twitter to voice their opinions.

Some viewers felt that her remarks bordered on hateful and accused her of harboring double standards.

Others criticized her for fixating on Harry and suggested she find more productive pursuits, like organizing community events.

The backlash was swift and vocal.

Despite the criticism, some audience members praised Vinn for her insights, labeling her as an exceptional royal commentator.

They echoed her sentiment that Harry should indeed extend an apology to his family.

This division in viewer reactions highlights the complexity of public sentiment surrounding the royal couple.

The controversy surrounding Angela Vinn’s statements reflects broader societal rifts regarding the monarchy and its members.