When you think of Harry and Meghan, it’s hard not to wonder if they ever really have a solid plan in place.

Especially when it comes to Meghan Markle, whose every endeavor seems to veer off course.

Their latest adventure with CBS’s Sunday Morning was supposed to be a polished interview highlighting Meghan’s new charitable initiative.

Instead, it morphed into a chaotic spectacle that left many questioning whether anyone on the team knew what they were doing.

Meghan, who often portrays herself as a savvy media figure, apparently thought that the CBS show would be hosted by Gayle King, Oprah’s close friend.

However, in a surprising twist, it’s actually Jane Pauley who leads Sunday Morning.

This oversight raises eyebrows, especially for someone who claims to have an extensive understanding of the media landscape.

It seems that Meghan’s grasp on basic television facts was lacking.

The complications didn’t end there.

Meghan’s team decided to launch the interview on her birthday, insisting that the world should stop and celebrate her special day.

CBS, however, had plans to air the segment in the fall, a time when audiences are likely to be more engaged after their summer breaks.

The choice to stick with her birthday instead proved to be a colossal misjudgment, resulting in a lackluster viewership overshadowed by competing programs.

This situation serves as a reminder that perhaps scheduling a media event during a personal celebration isn’t the best strategy, particularly when the goal is to reach a wider audience.

The irony is hard to miss: while CBS had invested significantly in promoting this interview, they were left scrambling to salvage the situation.

Meghan’s team pushed for unapproved changes to the format, forcing CBS to rely on clips rather than a full-scale promotional effort.

It almost feels like Meghan and her team were playing a game titled “How to Sabotage a Media Opportunity 101.”

And it’s not just the interview that’s been riddled with issues.

Meghan’s philanthropic efforts through the Archwell Foundation have also faced scrutiny.

Initially heralded as a major charitable endeavor, it has become emblematic of her perceived lack of genuine commitment to her causes.

Reports suggest that she dedicates less than an hour each week to the foundation’s activities.

Despite these ongoing challenges, Meghan seems perpetually surprised by the criticism she receives.

The interview didn’t generate the headlines she had hoped for, perhaps because the public is more interested in pressing global matters than in her repetitive narratives.

Rather than adjusting their approach in light of feedback, Meghan and her team appear to be doubling down on their existing strategy, which raises questions about their understanding of what resonates with audiences.

In the grand performance that is Meghan Markle’s media career, this latest chapter serves as yet another illustration of how her high-stakes endeavors often backfire.

Each attempt to reshape her public image tends to devolve into a farcical display, leaving many to wonder what the next act will entail.

Perhaps, with time, Meghan will come to realize that a little humility and a willingness to listen could make a significant difference in her media engagements.

After all, the art of communication is as much about understanding your audience as it is about self-promotion.

If she can grasp that, maybe her future endeavors will find a more favorable reception.