In a shocking turn of events, the truth behind Harry and Meghan’s surrogacy has been exposed.

It all started when Meg abruptly cut off contact with Harry after he misreported the birthdays of their children, Archie and Lily.

The couple had attempted to outsmart everyone by keeping the births a secret, refusing to do the traditional Lido wing photo op like other members of the royal family.

Instead, they resorted to lying about these events, only drawing more attention to the actual dates and revealing their true intentions.

Harry’s recent testimony in court shed light on the secrets that Meghan had risked her life to hide.

Among these secrets is the existence of two dolls hidden somewhere in the 16 bathrooms of their Montecito residence.

The details of this peculiar revelation remain unclear, leaving many puzzled.

During his second and final day of giving evidence, the Duke of Sussex appeared in court wearing a smart suit, accompanied by a snazzy silver tie.

However, there was something else that caught observers’ attention – a new spritz of lemon in his cocktail of complaints and a rousing grind of pepper on his ongoing grievances.

It seemed as though he had been instructed overnight to provide simple yes or no answers and stick to a predetermined script.

One notable aspect of Harry’s witness statement was the selective inclusion of dates.

While he provided the month, day, and year of his own birth, he only mentioned the month and year of his children’s births, wedding, and the year he met Meghan Markle.

This raises questions about the accuracy of the dates and whether they intentionally concealed the truth.

Why would they not proudly include the specific dates of their children’s births if they were indeed celebrated as claimed by the Sussexes?

Furthermore, the omission of his actual wedding date may be related to Meghan’s previous claim that they married days earlier in a garden ceremony.

Perhaps Harry wanted to avoid contradicting her statement.

Additionally, his inability to recall the month he first met Meghan raises doubts about the significance of these important dates and his commitment to providing accurate information under oath.

Samuel Fishwick, deputy editor of Independent Voices, shared his perspective on Harry’s historic testimony from his presence at the High Court.

Initially, things didn’t bode well for Harry as he failed to provide concrete evidence to substantiate the Mirror Group newspaper’s alleged unlawful information gathering.

Instead, coincidences were regarded with suspicion, but no definitive proof was presented.

Fishwick described the scene, with Andrew Green, the masterly figure presiding over the court, sternly peering down, occasionally removing his glasses to emphasize his points and then incredulously peering at Harry whenever he made a questionable statement.

On the other hand, Buckingham Palace has denied any deliberate snubbing of Harry’s granddaughter, Lilibet, on her second birthday.

Despite this claim, there was no official mention of her birthday on any royal family social media channels.

Adding to the confusion, Harry used the excuse of celebrating Lily’s birthday to be absent from court on Monday.

However, upon closer examination, there was no evidence of a suitable flight or a birthday party for the two-year-old.

As the trial continues, the revelations from Harry’s testimony have left many questioning the truth behind the couple’s actions and their willingness to deceive.

The lack of hard evidence presented by Harry raises doubts about the validity of his claims and the extent of the alleged hacking he endured for 15 years.

It seems that this courtroom battle has become an arduous exam for Harry, who has never been particularly fond of such challenges.

In conclusion, the surrogacy saga involving Harry and Meghan has taken a dramatic turn with the exposure of their deceptive practices and Harry’s apparent lack of recall regarding important dates.